Tuesday, August 29, 2006

Here's a $14 Billion Print Business That's Loving the Digital Revolution

Yellow Pages' Web-Based References Jump 20%; Book Form Still Relevant

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- As major media companies fret about how to keep the internet from cannibalizing their core business models, one print-based industry is finding traditional plus digital equals a whole greater than the sum of its parts.
For Yellow Pages, print and web aren't mutually exclusive, but complementary.
For Yellow Pages, print and web aren't mutually exclusive, but complementary.


Yellow Pages Association, the nonprofit trade group for the industry, conducted its annual usage survey and found references to the print books were down 100 million from last year (most surprising, that represents a decline of only 0.5%). But online references were up 300 million, or 20%.

Why print still works
"A lot of people would have predicted the death of this business a long time ago," said Neal Polachek, senior VP-research and consulting at Kelsey Group. "But what you can't do online yet is quickly and easily compare one plumber to another and make a couple calls. And that's the beauty of the book today."

It also perhaps points to the limitations of search and why, despite its promise, local-search ad spending is expected to reach $6 billion by 2010, while the yellow-pages industry is already a $14 billion business.

According to the YPA's usage study, the print and internet yellow pages aren't mutually exclusive, but complementary. In an average week, 49% of all U.S. adults refer to the print yellow pages and 6% refer to the internet yellow pages. In the course of a year, those numbers rise to 89% and 20%, respectively.

"We're not seeing any real product substitution going on," said Neg Norton, president of the YPA. "For our users, what they use depends on where they might be at the moment -- at work they're more inclined to use internet, at home they're more inclined to use paper."

Delicate balance
It's a delicate balance that the yellow-pages industry strikes with the internet, though, especially when companies like Google and Yahoo are both competitors and partners -- "our competition," Mr. Norton said.

Yellowpages.com, for example, distributes listings within a network that includes Google, Yahoo Local, Switchboard and AOL. The network is flexible, and yellowpages.com essentially acts as a reseller of that space.

"We recognize there are other players on the web, and although [yellowpages.com] is sizeable, all traffic doesn't come to yellowpages.com," said Matt Crowley, VP-marketing at yellowpages.com, a joint venture of AT&T and BellSouth. "The more we can provide access to others on the web the better for our clients."

Ultimately, the yellow-pages industry's deeply experienced and entrenched local sales team -- one that covers a lot of geographic ground and understands the needs of local businesses -- is one of its biggest assets and will likely remain unique to it, despite whatever number of new positions Google fills each week.

High-margin business
But like all traditional media, the yellow pages must also adapt. Right now it's a high-margin business -- on average running about 50% -- but it won't be that way forever, warns Mr. Polachek, who said there's an opportunity waiting to be tapped that would marry yellow-pages listings, opinion and user reviews, Angie's List-type reports and editorial content that might be in a newspaper.

Yellowpages.com has publicly surmised it may have a role to play in IPTV, a technology AT&T is using to deploy its nascent video service. Other applications for yellow-pages players might include in-car navigational systems.

In the meantime, internet yellow pages have been working to make their sites stickier and add features to give the online product the convenience of print. Yellowpages.com is offering click-to-see print ads and has added personalization tools that let users bookmark searches and make notes alongside listings, along with click-to-play audio ads. It's also contracting with MSN to use its virtual earth platform.

"We realize our core asset is our site, our brand," Mr. Crowley said.

Social Atlas Sites Let You Map Your Life

Read More About: Mapping

Social Atlas Sites Let You Map Your Life

New sites let you share memories, info with friends, family, or the entire internet.

Dennis O'Reilly

Friday, August 25, 2006 04:00 PM PDT
Click here to view full-size image.

No plain-vanilla mapping site knows your favorite haunts as well as you do. New online services tap that information by enabling you to share your knowledge and memories of your most beloved locales--in your hometown or on the other side of the globe--with the rest of the world. I looked at five of these services: Flagr, 43 Places, Platial, Plazes, and Wayfaring.

Built on conventional mapping data from services such as Google Maps, these sites let you add digital pushpins that link to personal descriptions of the locations. While any visitor can peruse the contributions of others on these sites, typically you must register in order to add content. But don't worry about having to provide credit card info: All five sites are free, requiring only that you submit a valid e\0x2011mail address. (Note, however, that Plazes is still in beta form, and that 43 Places may eventually charge a fee.)

Looking for New York City's best street art? Want to follow the virtual footsteps of Jack Bauer, protagonist of the TV show 24? Wayfaring Media's Wayfaring has directions for both. Users can also post comments on other users' maps.

Though most contributors offer a lighthearted look at their locations, some at Platial tell dark tales, such as those tied to locations of recent shark attacks. The site, which calls itself "The People's Atlas," recently added a feature that links its maps to RSS feeds, so you can receive alerts about new annotations for places that interest you, or by other users whom you specify--giving the site a timeliness that the others I looked at lacked. Several of the sites I visited allow you to add images to your text posts, but Platial is the only one that supports video uploads.

Traveler Wish Lists

Anyone who has ever used Yahoo's popular Flickr photo-sharing service recognizes how tags work: Users assign keywords to categorize images. The same approach is taken by the Robot Co-op's 43 Places, which--despite its name--has descriptions of thousands of locales around the world. Along with the usual place names, you'll find tags such as "Hogwarts" and "Pirates of the Caribbean," illustrating that travel is sometimes a state of mind. The site even posts user-assigned "wanderlust ratings" for each mapped location, though it's difficult to find any spot with a rating under 80 percent (100 percent is the highest possible mark).

Plazes ties user-supplied data to network router locations (called Plazes), as automatically identified by free, downloadable desktop software that also lets people (all users or, at your discretion, invited friends) see where you are. You can use the service without the downloaded app to find other Plazes and users--but unless you use the software, you can't add a Plaze to the service's database, and others won't be able to see your precise location.

The least developed of the five services is Flagr, self-described as a "Sharewhere" site. It has relatively few annotated locations, and the descriptions I checked lacked detail. Flagr demonstrates that, like all sites that rely on community-created content, personal-mapping services depend on attracting a critical mass of participants.

Privacy Issues

One key caveat: These and other personal-mapping sites have built-in privacy risks. Though all five of the services I tested offer some ability to control who can see your data, you are entrusting personal information to a Web server. In general, it's a bad idea to post any data you wouldn't feel comfortable writing on a postcard sent via U.S. mail.

Time will tell whether any of these ambitious services will ever become the mapping equivalent of such community powerhouses as MySpace or YouTube. But if you're going to check out just one, head to Platial, which seems to have more--and more-detailed--posts than its competitors.

-- Dennis O'Reilly

Blog Archive